Why
Litigation Support? The Sky is the Limit
Steven Keeva ABA Journal, May
1990
Every
area of computer automation has its philosophers, practitioners who look
beyond the obvious into the whys and wherefores of their particular bailiwicks.
Typically, these people see vast implications where others see only hardware
and software.
Two
such seers in the area of litigation support are Walter Bithell, of Holland
& Hart in Boise, Idaho, and Sam Guiberson, of Guiberson Law Offices in
Houston. Both are litigators with the experience and insight to shed light
on what, for many, is murky territory indeed.
"If
you look at it as just a system for filing documents, it's really a waste,"
Bithell says. "But that's the way a lot of lawyers use it. Instead, it should
be used as a way of getting a handle on lots of documents so that we can
think our way through them. It allows a lawyer to pick up on fact patterns,
and that's really what litigation is all about."
Guiberson
adds that the marketplace has tended to create unrealistic expectations
about computers. "It's far too simplistic for lawyers who have not done
this work to think that all they need to do to catch up with the trend is
to go out and buy something off the shelf," he says. "The truth is that
there is no shelf upon which the really decisive skills can be found. Those
skills are more organizational and process-oriented, and they aren't for
sale out there. It's learned through experience."
When
practitioners realize that litigation support is simply an adjunct to their
thinking process, albeit a very powerful one. Bithell and Guiberson
agree, the sky is the limit.
"Once
you input the information into your system, you can just sit there and generate
all sorts of interesting areas to explore," Bithell says.
"You
can say, for example, I wonder what was going on here in June. I wonder
who wrote the first letter that prompted party number one to respond this
way. I wonder when the first time this subject comes up in any of the documentation.
I wonder if it was ever discussed at a board meeting ... and so on. It's
a great way to highlight factual patterns that could be crucial in your
case."
Guiberson
uses a visual metaphor to describe what litigation support technology can
do: "As we move along the paper trail, what we have studied becomes more
remote and what we have looked at most recently becomes more present in
our minds, even though that may not be representative of the merits of the
particular case.
"But
what computers do is put you in the center of a paper sphere where every
document and every piece of data is equally accessible to your intellectual
process. That way, you're no longer victimized by your immediate recollection.
You can postulate or consider relationships that are far broader than those
based on what you read yesterday or what you forgot last month. This brings
about a big change in the way you approach evidence and investigate facts."
Bithell
and Guiberson agree that it also tends to change the competitive rules of
law practice itself. "Litigation support is a great equalizer," Bithell
says. "It opens up a whole series of options to small and medium size firms
that they didn't have before." According to Guiberson, the changes wrought
by this technology are nothing short of revolutionary.
"The
necessity of building large organizations to supply expertise and analysis
for large lawsuits may be a thing of the past," he says. "Now the kind of
organization that is capable of taking on major litigation is much, much
smaller, albeit better trained, than it had to be before."
|